tag:mentalfaculty.tenderapp.com,2010-10-19:/discussions/suggestions/10187-small-annoying-bug-in-text-pane-and-tag-paneThe Mental Faculty: Discussion 2018-10-19T02:24:19Ztag:mentalfaculty.tenderapp.com,2010-10-19:Comment/395246982016-04-01T17:31:48Z2016-04-01T17:31:48ZSmall annoying bug in text pane and tag pane<div><p>Very difficult to 'fix' that, because what you want is what most
people would not want. When you go to a new card, you usually want
to start editing in the first field, and close down editing of
where you were in the last card.</p>
<p>Maybe we can make an exception if the tags field happens to be
selected. I'll think about that.</p>
<p>But it sounds like what you would really need is bulk tagging,
which is a feature we have been thinking about for a while.</p>
<p>Drew</p></div>drewmccormacktag:mentalfaculty.tenderapp.com,2010-10-19:Comment/395246982016-04-04T07:37:12Z2016-04-04T07:37:13ZSmall annoying bug in text pane and tag pane<div><p>Very difficult to 'fix' that, because what you want is what most
people would not want. When you go to a new card, you usually want
to start editing in the first field, and close down editing of
where you were in the last card.<br>
=> that's reasonable indeed.</p>
<p>Maybe we can make an exception if the tags field happens to be
selected. I'll think about that.<br>
=> That's indeed what I had in mind. By default, one could keep
the editing field, being the most plausible one being needed. Once
the users prompts the app otherwise, manually selecting the tag
field (meaning that's where he wants to edit), the app ought simply
to acknowledge that by not automatically jumping back to the
default editing field.</p>
<p>But it sounds like what you would really need is bulk tagging,
which is a feature we have been thinking about for a while.<br>
=> that would be a useful option, indeed.</p></div>peter Narkis